Texas Proposition 2 (2005)

Legal recognition of
same-sex relationships
Marriage

Argentina
Belgium
Canada
Iceland
Netherlands

Norway
Portugal
South Africa
Spain
Sweden

Performed in some jurisdictions

Mexico: Mexico City
United States: CT, DC, IA, MA, NH, NY, VT, Coquille, Suquamish

Recognized, not performed

Aruba (Netherlands only)
Curaçao (Netherlands only)
Israel
Mexico: all states (Mexico City only)
Sint Maarten (Netherlands only)
United States: CA (conditional), MD

Civil unions and
registered partnerships

Andorra
Austria
Brazil
Colombia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Ecuador
Finland
France
- New Caledonia
- Wallis and Futuna
Germany

Greenland
Hungary
Ireland
Isle of Man
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Slovenia
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Uruguay

Performed in some jurisdictions

Australia: ACT, NSW, QLD, TAS, VIC
Mexico: COA
United States: CA, CO, DE, HI, IL, ME, NJ, NV, OR, RI, WA, WI

Unregistered cohabitation

Australia
Croatia

Israel

Recognized in some jurisdictions

United States: MD

See also

Same-sex marriage
Same-sex marriage legislation
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Marriage privatization
Civil union
Domestic partnership
Listings by country

LGBT portal

Texas Proposition 2 of 2005 created an amendment that limits marriage to opposite-sex relationships and prohibits alternative legal arrangements of a similar nature. The bill intended to amend the Texas Constitution to make it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages, plural marriages, or civil unions. The referendum was approved by 76% of the voters, with Travis County, Texas (which contains Austin, Texas) the only county opposing the amendment.[1]

The text of the amendment states:

(a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.

(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.[2]

Shortly before the election, a minister in Austin, Texas, opposed the amendment on technical grounds. According to the minister, the wording of subsection (b) could actually be used to outlaw marriage itself. Proponents claimed that such reasoning was simply a "smokescreen" to confuse voters on the issue.[3][4] In November 2009, Barbara Ann Radnofsky, a candidate for Texas attorney general, echoed the assertion that, since marriage is by definition identical to itself, the amendment outlaws all marriage in Texas.[5]

Contents

2009 Divorce Challenge

The status of the amendment was struck down in a lower court ruling on October 1, 2009, by Dallas District Judge Tena Callahan on the grounds that it denies same-sex couples equal treatment under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit was filed by a same-sex couple living in Dallas who had married in Massachusetts in 2006 and were seeking to get a divorce in Texas, because Massachusetts only permits state residents to sue for divorce. Dallas attorney Peter Schulte also claimed the protection of Article IV of the U. S. Constitution, which gives "full faith and credit" by all states to acts validly performed in one. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott and Governor Rick Perry appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas, Texas, hoping to get the decision overturned. On August 31, 2010 The Court reversed the ruling on the grounds that the Texas constitutional ban on same-sex marriage does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court further ruled that district courts in Texas do not have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear a same-sex divorce case. The case is known as In Re Marriage of J.B. and H.B.[6] Same-sex marriages are still illegal in Texas. AP

See also

References

  1. ^ 2005 Constitutional Amendment Election, Texas Secretary of State, Elections Division. Accessed 22 December 2006.
  2. ^ Texas Constitution, Article I, section 32. Accessed 22 December 2006.
  3. ^ Smith, Amy (2005-10-28), "Group Says Prop. 2 Could Make Straight Marriage Illegal", The Austin Chronicle, http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A303822, retrieved 2010-01-30 
  4. ^ "Queerly Beloved: Marriage-amendment backers claim fraud". WorldNetDaily. 2005-10-26. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47039. Retrieved 2010-01-30. 
  5. ^ Montgomery, Dave (2009-11-17), "Texas marriages in legal limbo due to 2005 error, Democrat says", Fort Worth Star-Telegram, http://www.star-telegram.com/804/story/1770189.html, retrieved 2009-11-20 
  6. ^ Appleton, Roy (2010-08-31). "Dallas judge's ruling saying gay couple could divorce in Texas rejected on appeal". The Dallas Morning News. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/090110dnmetgaydivorce.aa8079fa.html. Retrieved 2010-08-31. 

External links